Re: idea for concurrent seqscans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From William Volkman
Subject Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Date
Msg-id 1109413689.14897.8.camel@chrysalis.netshark.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Responses Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:49, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:51:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> > >> but I also hate to burden the developers with rewriting a lot of
> > >> regression tests when their time could be better spent elsewhere.

The patch is for *concurrent* seqscans, would the regression tests
even be affected by this (IIRC they are single user, single process)?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans