Re: pg primary key bug? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Ragnar Hafstað
Subject Re: pg primary key bug?
Date
Msg-id 1109073162.17839.124.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg primary key bug?  (pginfo <pginfo@t1.unisoftbg.com>)
Responses Re: pg primary key bug?  (Markus Schaber <schabios@logi-track.com>)
List pgsql-sql
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 10:33 +0100, pginfo wrote:
> 
>   
> We are using  jdbc (jdbc driver from pg)  + jboss (java based
> application server) + connection pool (biult in jboss).
> ...
> Will vacuum full generate this problem if we have locked table in this
> time? (It is possible to have locked table in theory)

I do not know if this is relevant, but I have seen jboss applications
keep sessions in 'Idle in transaction' state, apparently with some
locks granted. Would such cases not interfere with vacuum?

gnari




pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: pginfo
Date:
Subject: Re: pg primary key bug?
Next
From: pginfo
Date:
Subject: Re: pg primary key bug?