Re: Concurrent free-lock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Concurrent free-lock
Date
Msg-id 1106611627.1780.32.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrent free-lock  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu>)
Responses Re: Concurrent free-lock
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:50 -0700, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Here is some pretty good info on lock-free structures... I'm pretty sure 
> I tested their code in a multithreaded high-concurrency environment and 
> experienced the problems I was discussing.

Fair enough, but my hope would be that those problems were the result of
bugs in the implementation rather than some fundamental property of
lock-free data structures. A concurrency control mechanism that falls
over under concurrent access sounds a little broken, no?

-Neil




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Darcy Buskermolen
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Disallow LOAD to non-superusers.
Next
From: "Min Xu (Hsu)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent free-lock