On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 13:19, Kavan, Dan (IMS) wrote:
> I hate to admit this publically, but I've been reading my results
> backwards.
>
> I was getting 100 tps on Solaris - postgres 64 bit and 300 tps on SUSE
> postgres both x86-64.
> So, 300 is better than 100 right? I was reading it backwards.
> I was thinking 300 was the actual speed to process a certain amount of
> transactions, but actually the x86-64 system is performing better than
> all, not worse.
>
> ~Dj
>
>
>
> Yes, they are both running on the same hardware - NAS.
Yep, 300 is better than 100. Glad to hear it.
