On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 02:21 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
> > John wanted us to allow use of the 'locale' and 'utf8' pragmas in trusted
> > code.
>
> You know, there's something twisted in postgres's naming scheme here. How is
> it that "trusted" languages the ones that need a sandbox? and "untrusted"
> languages the ones that get to run amok without restrictions?
>
> I would have thought it would be the other way around.
It's not that you trust the language, it that you trust the PostgreSQL
despite the language.
--
