Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions
Date
Msg-id 1101252170.2948.174.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 23:08, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > as per SQL:2003 Annex E pp.1173-1175 "Incompatibilities with
> > SQL:1999", specifically point 17, pp.1174-1175:
> >
> > "A number of additional <reserved word>s have been added to the
> > language".
>
> I think you are confusing keywords.c with the SQL standard.

Hmmm... the difference was clear to me, since I edited one, but not the
other. ;)

If you are saying "we should not support the SQL standard with regard to
the new reserved words added in SQL:2003", I would understand, but not
agree.

With you lies the power to apply, all some or none of the patch, as you
choose. It was tedious enough to write the patch...

--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions