On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 20:59, Greg Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
> > > I'd vote in favour of relaxing the limit entirely, as Sean suggests.
> >
> > The choice is not between "limit" and "no limit", it is between
> > "limit" and "broken".
>
> What do you think is broken about fragmented UDP packets?
>
...probably that pgstat.c doesn't handle them at all, so if they occur
then you've lost data. Until that is fixed, we have a limit.
--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
