Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC
Date
Msg-id 10985.1260375091@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC  (Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg@fts.ee>)
List pgsql-bugs
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> Still, even though the code is preposterous, the result shouldn't be a
> segfault. I wasn't able to reproduce one myself (using 8.3.7 on
> freebsd 7.2) however.

Yeah, for me it also recurses till the exception is hit, and then
processes that successfully.  This is effectively identical to a case
in the standard regression tests, which also intentionally recurses
till stack overflow.  Since we have FreeBSD machines in the buildfarm,
it is reasonably safe to conclude that this isn't a generic FreeBSD
bug.  I suspect the OP has used some unusual configure/build option
or linked in some nonstandard code that is causing the available
stack space to change unexpectedly.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC
Next
From: Mike Landis
Date:
Subject: getting libpqd.lib and libpqd.dll for postgesql 8.4.1 on Vista with VS8 or cygwin g++