Re: SHMMAX and shared_bufffers - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SHMMAX and shared_bufffers
Date
Msg-id 10985.1226431892@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SHMMAX and shared_bufffers  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
List pgsql-general
Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 02:17:20PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> shared_buffers is not the only factor to shared memory, so you need to
>> provide some extra SHMMAX slop.

> what is this "extra slop" needed for?

See table 17-2 here
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem using COPY command to load data
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp precission question