On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 03:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is anyone feeling masochistic and wants to review the SQL standards
> conformance chapter in the documentation for SQL 2003?
Another useful improvement would be to update the "Standards
conformance" section of the SQL command reference pages to refer to
SQL:2003 consistently. At present they refer to a mix of SQL-92,
SQL:1999, and SQL:2003.
-Neil
