Re: The future of built-in geometric data types - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Daniel Martini
Subject Re: The future of built-in geometric data types
Date
Msg-id 1094135621.41372f45a0b39@webmail.uni-hohenheim.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The future of built-in geometric data types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Citing Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:52:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com> writes:
> >>> I'm pretty clueless in regard to the PostGIS situation. Will it be
> >>> integrated with PostgreSQL in the future?
> >>
> >> No.  Wrong license.
>
> > If the license were changed to be BSD compatible, are there other
> > barriers to adoption?
>
> Not sure, but the question is moot.  We've already asked the PostGIS
> guys to consider a license change, and they've declined.
>
>             regards, tom lane

What if a lot of people asked?
(I would be one of them).

Regards,
Daniel

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Boes
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible to insert quoted null value into integer field?
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign key locks