Are you then still trying to delete the dependent row in your function?
That wouldn't make any sense, since the cascading fk should delete it
anyway.
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 03:00, Pradeepkumar, Pyatalo (IE10) wrote:
> I have done that. while creating table2 i have specified ON DELETE CASCADE
> for the foreign key constraint.
> But I am getting this error when i call the function from a C++ file.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe@qwest.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 1:49 PM
> To: Pradeepkumar, Pyatalo (IE10)
> Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Help on triggers
>
>
> On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 23:27, Pradeepkumar, Pyatalo (IE10) wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have 2 tables - table1 and table2. Both the tables are related to each
> > other. I have written triggers so that if a tuple is inserted into table1,
> > corresponding values will be inserted into table2. and if a tuple is
> deleted
> > from table1 then corresponding tuples are deleted from table2 also. The
> > delete trigger works fine sometimes and other times it gives the following
> > error.....
> >
> > delete from table1 where pointid=30;
> > ERROR: update or delete on "table1" violates foreign key constraint "$2"
> on
> > "table2"
> > DETAIL: key (pointid) =30 is still referenced from table
> "pointattributes".
> >
> > I am doing an application in C. I have written a C-function using libpq
> API
> > to delete a tuple from table1. that is I pass a parameter to the function
> > and it has to delete the tuple whose primarykey value= parameter and also
> > delete correspoding tuples from table2(due to the trigger). so i have
> formed
> > a simple delete command on table2in the C-function. When i compile the
> > application it gives the same error:
> >
> > is there anyone who can explain why this is happening. I had posted this
> > query 2 days back...dint get any reply. Please help me out with this.
>
> Using foreign keys, you should be able to just set the relation to
> cascade and have the dependent rows deleted automagically.
>
