Re: Planning for beta (was Re: Sketch of extending error handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Planning for beta (was Re: Sketch of extending error handling
Date
Msg-id 1090751751.3057.267.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Planning for beta (was Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Planning for beta (was Re: Sketch of extending error  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 04:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Other than the spectacular lack of documentation, I don't think we are
> >> in bad shape at all.
> 
> > OK, that helps. Alvaro had a number of items floating around and I
> > wasn't sure where he was on them.   Same with PITR.  Once the number of
> > open items for a project is over about six, I get lost.  Is there a
> > sense you and the patch authors have identified them all and are working
> > on them so I don't have to worry about them?  I don't care if they
> > aren't done as much as I don't want them to be forgotten.
> 
> I think we know what we have to do.  Alvaro, Simon, do you feel that
> we are on track for beta at the end of the month?  Could you post
> your current to-do lists for NT and PITR?
> 

Yes, I feel we are on track for beta.

All known/reported bugs located and solved. 
Issue that Create Database doesn't generate redo not addressed, but
lower priority issue.

The TODO list below is about a third of what it was about 8 days ago.
All the refactoring I'd thought about is done, some error pockets
cleaned up - as well as a few investigations that I hadn't had time for.

I'm personally expecting to deliver these before Beta...
1. today (not in SGML)
2. design posted today

PITR TODO for 7.5
=================

HIGH
1. Documentation (sr) (now)
- Backup and Recovery chapter
- WAL chapter

MEDIUM
2. Start/End Backup: Parameter value sanity, e.g.
- is recoveryTargetTime > last checkpoint time
- is recoveryTargetTime > backup end time
- is recoveryTargetXid > last checkpoint xid
- is recoveryTargetXid > backup end txnid

3. Full test plan
- same status as regression tests
- allow re-test of functionality
- confirm viability on all ports

- re-write "example scenarios" into more of a test plan, so people can
see what's been tested and what to test their port against
- test scripts
- test server against those

4. Off-line log inspector (sr) (aug/sept)
- Locate a potential recovery point
- Confirm that the logs have the potential for recovery (to that point)

5. Write logging/redo for resource managers/action types
- Create Database (aug/sept?)
- any others? 

LOWER
6. Performance testing

OTHER - related to WAL, but not PITR
7. PreallocXlogFiles


Comments, suggestions and additions welcome.

All assistance in completing the above is most welcome,

-- 
Best Regards, Simon Riggs



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: resowner.c $PostgreSQL$
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.5 release notes