Re: Point in Time Recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date
Msg-id 1089789682.17493.3890.camel@stromboli
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Point in Time Recovery  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: Point in Time Recovery  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Point in Time Recovery  (SAKATA Tetsuo <sakata.tetsuo@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 03:31, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Can you give us some suggestions of what kind of stuff to test?  Is
> there a way we can artificially kill the backend in all sorts of nasty
> spots to see if recovery works?  Does kill -9 simulate a 'power off'?
>

I was hoping some fiendish plans would be presented to me...

But please start with "this feels like typical usage" and we'll go from
there...the important thing is to try the first one.

I've not done power off tests, yet. They need to be done just to
check...actually you don't need to do this to test PITR...

We need to exhaustive tests of...
- power off
- scp and cross network copies
- all the permuted recovery options
- archive_mode = off (i.e. current behaviour)
- deliberately incorrectly set options (idiot-proof testing)

I'd love some help assembling a test document with numbered tests...

Best regards, Simon Riggs


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Assisting developers
Next
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: Assisting developers