On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 22:29, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> Oh, and it doesn't handle WAL. Tom mentioned/agreed that btree's method of
> dumping whole pages into WAL would be the best/most efficient way to
> journaling this and that the btree code should be generalised. I haven't
> had time to look at this yet.
>
Not sure whether it is really desirable that it does. Could be some damn
big tablespaces moved and do we really want all of that in the log?
I think we can leave it for now, maybe add a "dont log" option later,
and then change the default to logging.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
