Re: lock timeout patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: lock timeout patch
Date
Msg-id 1088450694.31168.71.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lock timeout patch  (Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus@nttdata.co.jp>)
Responses Re: lock timeout patch
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 02:16, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'd accept a mechanism to enforce a timeout at the lock level if you
> > could show me a convincing use-case for lock timeouts instead of
> > statement timeouts, but I don't believe there is one.  I think this
> > proposal is a solution in search of a problem.
> 
> I think statement_timeout and lock_timeout are different.
> 
> If I set statement_timeout to 1000 to detect a lock timeout,
> I can't run a query which takes over 1 sec.
> 
> If a lock wait is occured, I want to detect it immediately,
> but I still want to run a long-running query.
> 

How is your problem not solved by NOWAIT?
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-lock.html

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Darko Prenosil
Date:
Subject: improper call to spi_printtup ???
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: improper call to spi_printtup ???