Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date
Msg-id 1088.1360224096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> What about

> 3) Use reltoastidxid if != InvalidOid and manually build the list (using
> RelationGetIndexList) otherwise?

Do we actually need reltoastidxid at all?  I always thought having that
field was a case of premature optimization.  There might be some case
for keeping it to avoid breaking any client-side code that might be
looking at it ... but if you're proposing changing the field contents
anyway, that argument goes right out the window.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY