On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 14:47, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I'm not sure, but seems the reference to work_mem is gone?
Not sure what you mean; neither the old version of the docs nor the new
version mentioned work_mem, they mention "maintenance_work_mem", and the
patch doesn't change that. I also replaced a solitary tip to increase
maintenance_work_mem in the Backup & Restore chapter with an xref to the
full documentation on improving bulk loading performance, which covers
the topic more fully.
-Neil
