Re: Postmaster not dropping connections on tomcat restart. - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Postmaster not dropping connections on tomcat restart.
Date
Msg-id 1079987809.1318.208.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postmaster not dropping connections on tomcat restart.  (Paul Thomas <paul@tmsl.demon.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Postmaster not dropping connections on tomcat restart.
List pgsql-jdbc
Please look a the docs at
http://doc.postgresintl.com/jdbc/ch11s04.html

I set his up and tested it, it works!

Dave

On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 13:09, Paul Thomas wrote:
> On 22/03/2004 16:15 dinakar wrote:
> >
> > Even i have the same problem what Paul Davis said with
> > respect to connection,
> >
> > >>Is the connection pool defined within you web app's
> > >>context?
> > yes i have defined the pool in the server.xml file and
> > reference in the web.xml file.
>
> That's not what I meant. Refer to the Tomcat docs and you'll see that you
> can declare resources in various places. I declare my connection pool
> stuff with my apps <Context></Context> block. I do this primarily because
> I can then put all of this in a seperate XML file named myapp.xml and just
> drop this file into Tomcat 4.1's webapps directory (again, refer to
> Tomcat's docs for this). As I'm sure you know, Tomcat gives each web app
> its own class loader so that when I stop my app, the connection pool also
> gets closed down and PostgreSQL cleans up its connections. But if you
> declare your connection pool outside of any context, I doubt that it would
> be closed down except when you stop Tomcat itself.
>
> > pls provide us a solution.
>
> I don't have a solution. I _never_ get the problem. All I can suggest is
> that you try it my way and see if helps. Other than that, you need to get
> support from the Tomcat lists.
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Harry Mantheakis
Date:
Subject: Re: Postmaster not dropping connections on tomcat restart.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: call syntax for record returning stored function