Re: CommitDelay performance improvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: CommitDelay performance improvement
Date
Msg-id 10797.982991229@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CommitDelay performance improvement  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Responses Re: CommitDelay performance improvement  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> It may have been much earler in the debate, but has anyone checked to see
> what the maximum possible gains might be - or is it self-evident to people
> who know the code?

fsync off provides an upper bound to the speed achievable from being
smarter about when to fsync... I doubt that fsync-once-per-checkpoint
would be much different.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CommitDelay performance improvement
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: CommitDelay performance improvement