Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Date
Msg-id 1075209033.30531.22906.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> AFAIK the only target build environment for Windows right now is MinGW/gcc
> >> 
> >> If anyone knows how to get the M$ compilers to work nicely with our build
> >> system that might be interesting, but probably at a later stage.
> 
> > MS C compiler usage would require gmake and a whole host of other stuff
> > that doesn't seem worth doing.
> 
> Um, good point.  Porting our Makefiles to anything but gmake seems
> completely out of the question.  So unless someone has a Windows build
> environment that has gmake but not gcc, this is moot.
> 

Tom, check out
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2004-01/msg00017.php

Looking at the interix website, they seem to have gmake but no gcc,
which seems to fit into your scenario above. Incedentally they do 
distribute a compiled PostgreSQL with their packages, though it's based
on 7.2 according to the author.  

Robert Treat 
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Haney
Date:
Subject: Re: Recursive optimization of IN subqueries
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Recursive optimization of IN subqueries