Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Cott Lang
Subject Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
Date
Msg-id 1074783612.4336.1.camel@blackbox
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?  (<lnd@hnit.is>)
Responses Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 07:38, lnd@hnit.is wrote:

> Meaning incremental (hot)-backups?
> Or as protection against DROP/TRUNCATE/DELETE ALL TABLE/SCHEMA/DATABASE?
>
> With a WAL it should be doable in some 7.x version, all ingredients are
> there.
>
> Possibly someone suceeded in doing it already? Having a baseline backup and
> saved WAL logs, shouldn't it be possible to recover?

Incremental pg_dumps would be a huge step in the right direction!

However, unless I am mistaken, a baseline backup would need to be taken
cold because you cannot take a consistent online backup of the data
files without using file system snapshots or split mirrors, and even
that's questionable.




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "John Wells"
Date:
Subject: Want a job?
Next
From: Henk van Lingen
Date:
Subject: Re: trust auth in 7.4