Re: Converting from Progress 4GL and DBMS - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Converting from Progress 4GL and DBMS
Date
Msg-id 1074486535.19154.183.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Converting from Progress 4GL and DBMS  ("John Wells" <jb@sourceillustrated.com>)
List pgsql-general
John

Have a look at the aubit project

www.aubit.com

Thye have a 4GL aimed at informix, but there is a postgres port.

Dave
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 20:31, John Wells wrote:
> I corresponded on the list in the past with some folks who'd gone through
> a successful migration from Progress Software Corporation's database and
> 4gl to Postgresql and another gui or web solution.
>
> I've since taken over as director of our software development group, and
> my top priority is to rid myself (and the company) of Progress.  Working
> with their licensing group has felt like dealing with la cosa nostra...
>
> Anyway, I'm looking for two things: 1. insight and suggestions from anyone
> who's gone through a similar experience, and 2. potenatial for-hire
> resources for either consulting my team on our effort or for the actual
> conversion itself.  We don't have a massive budget, but at least there IS
> a budget.
>
> We are forging forward soon regardless if we're able to find outside help,
> but I hope someone in the Postgres community can point me in the right
> direction.
>
> Feel free to email me on or off list, or, alternatively, you can reach me
> at my work email at john.wells@timco.aero.
>
> Thanks!
>
> John
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 1467551


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Wood
Date:
Subject: Re: Integer ranges in PostgreSQL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding long text to a database text field generates errors