Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:51 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Diff looks fine, but I'm not sure that it's appropriate to characterize
>> the existing code as an oversight. It was a necessary hack while the
>> executor was behaving as it did (ie, using the first child as root).
> Ah, you're right. I've updated the commit message. Will push later today.
I'd suggest specifying *first* child RTE in the commit message.
LGTM otherwise.
regards, tom lane