Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 1071262744.30118.43.camel@zedora.zeut.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 15:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alternative thought: just recommend that if possible, people take
> a filesystem dump of their old PGDATA directory after stopping
> the old postmaster.  This would be sufficient for retreating to
> the prior version if needed.  It might or might not be slower
> than copying all the files to a new PGDATA ...

Certainly the easier path code wise :-)  Being the belt, suspenders and
steel tip boots (foot gun protection) type that I am, I would make a
backup even if pg_upgrade copies all the data files.  Having pg_upgrade
copy the data files give you an extra layer of protection if desired,
and can possibly save an admin who fails to get a good backup of the old
PGDATA for what ever reason.  



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Manfred Spraul
Date:
Subject: Re: fsync method checking
Next
From: Thomas Swan
Date:
Subject: Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade