Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Marek Florianczyk
Subject Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Date
Msg-id 1068050668.28821.143.camel@franki-laptop.tpi.pl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
List pgsql-admin
W liście z śro, 05-11-2003, godz. 17:24, Andrew Sullivan pisze:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:48:52AM -0500, Jeff wrote:
> >
> > as far as I know, -HUP won't make things like shared buffer changes
> > take. you need a full restart of PG.
>
> It definitely will not.  Anything that can only be set on "startup"
> actually means startup.
>
> > but your numbers are different... I guess it did take. huh.
>
> No, that probably just means that there is more variability to runs
> than people like to imagine.

It look's like I will have to make this tests again. It's not big deal,
just when I solve slow "\d table" problem.
VACUUM ANALYZE in progress...

thanks,

Marek


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases