opteron port [was: Re: Call for port reports] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noèl Köthe
Subject opteron port [was: Re: Call for port reports]
Date
Msg-id 1067524881.1359.85.camel@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for port reports  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am So, den 26.10.2003 schrieb Bruce Momjian um 02:38:

> >  All 93 tests passed.
...
> > Linux pergolesi 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 20:56:25 CEST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
> >
> > It says i686 but its AMD Opteron:
> >
> > noel@pergolesi:~/pgsql$ cat /proc/cpuinfo |more
...
> > model name      : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 240
...
> I am confused how to handle this.  Is this running in 32-bit mode?  I am
> inclined to mention Opteron only when tested in 64-bit mode, because I
> think we all assume a 32-bit Opteron is the same as a standard
> AMD/Intel.  Does uname report differently in 64-bit mode.

You are right. Its now just like an i386 so it doesn't make sense to
list it. When I will get access to an 64bit Opteron system I will test
it again.

--
Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Call for port reports
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test