Re: Press Release - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Press Release
Date
Msg-id 1067475721.8672.51.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Press Release  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Press Release  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:57, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >Why are you running a vacuum full -- forgot to do a regular vacuum often
> >enough?
> >
> No because if we don't run a vacuum full on this (actually a couple of)
> machine
> then the machine slows down to a crawl over time. Vacuums are run every
> 4 or 5 hours
> and a vacuum full every night.
>
> I am obviously missing something and relying on past knowledge.

Yup.. Sounds like fsm is too low. Bump it up an order of magnitude and
vacuum hourly instead -- drop the FULL.

> >PostgreSQL also won't be answering queries if I unplug the
> >machine it is on, toss it into the back of a plane and fly it to another
> >data centre.
> >
> O.k. this was a ridiculous analogy.

Not really.. I see to do the data centre move more often than a VACUUM
FULL.


Attachment

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Press Release
Next
From: Jussi Mikkola
Date:
Subject: Re: Press Release and eRServer