Re: RES: bug? Drop column and SQL functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: RES: bug? Drop column and SQL functions
Date
Msg-id 1067435290.99917.31.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to RES: bug? Drop column and SQL functions  ("Thiago Fernandes Moesch" <thiago@dinamize.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 06:54, Thiago Fernandes Moesch wrote:
>    I have a comment on something like that to: Why - when creating a view
> using explicit * on select - postgresql reads all the fields in the query
> and especify them one by one on the view definition? Developers always have
> to check every view after changing a table definition to be certain it does
> not need to be recreated.

I would have thought dependency tracking added in 7.3 would tell you
when views cannot be updated to accommodate the table change.

Functions on the other hand do not have any dependency tracking.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: O_DIRECT in freebsd