Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 10670.1315577108@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> I have to wonder though, if it wouldn't be less confusing to just get
> rid of recovery.conf and use a *different* file for this. Just to make
> it clear it's not a config file, but just a boolean exists/notexists
> state.

+1.  If it's not a configuration file anymore, it shouldn't be called
one.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup