Re: sun solaris & postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Cindy
Subject Re: sun solaris & postgres
Date
Msg-id 10648.1021928974@stephanus.tlg.uci.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sun solaris & postgres  (Darren Ferguson <darren@crystalballinc.com>)
List pgsql-general
No, if you read more carefully, att is the one that is performing its
operations an order of magnitude faster than steph, which is why we're
so stumped.  But I think I located the problem (see other email).

Darren Ferguson writes:
 >That could be why 7.1.3 is out performing it has 8 times more memory than
 >the 7.2.1 machine
 >
 >What about CPU's, controllers and are both config files the same for steph
 >and att?
 >
 >Darren Ferguson
 >
 >On Mon, 20 May 2002, Cindy wrote:
 >
 >>
 >> mpls@ipv6.dns2go.com writes:
 >>  >
 >>  >Difference specification ??
 >>  >How many memory in att and steph?
 >>
 >> steph has
 >> Memory size: 4096 Megabytes
 >> att has
 >> Memory size: 512 Megabytes
 >>
 >> --Cindy
 >>
 >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
 >> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
 >>
 >> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
 >>
 >
 >
 >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
 >TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
 >
 >http://archives.postgresql.org
 >

--
Cindy
ctmoore@uci.edu

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Cindy
Date:
Subject: Re: sun solaris & postgres
Next
From: "Daniel Morgan"
Date:
Subject: ANN: Npgsql - .Net Data Provider for PostgreSQL