Re: State of Beta 2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: State of Beta 2
Date
Msg-id 1064701668.23957.96.camel@haggis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of Beta 2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: State of Beta 2
List pgsql-general
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 17:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The reason that it needs to be rewritten in C is that it needs access to
> >> internal stuff that the backend doesn't expose.
>
> > True, but doing all that text manipulation is C is going to be very hard
> > to do and maintain.
>
> Text manipulation?  I don't think that pg_upgrade has to do much text
> manipulation.  (The shell-script version might do so, but that's only
> because it has to cast the problem in terms of program I/O.)

There's always the general point that C has more pitfalls (mainly
from pointers/free()/malloc(), and HLLs do more for you, thus you
have to code less, and, consequently, there are fewer bugs.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA

484,246 sq mi are needed for 6 billion people to live, 4 persons
per lot, in lots that are 60'x150'.
That is ~ California, Texas and Missouri.
Alternatively, France, Spain and The United Kingdom.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2