Re: PL contribution guidelines? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: PL contribution guidelines?
Date
Msg-id 1064520876.17819.2182.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL contribution guidelines?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 13:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> scott.marlowe wrote:
> > On 25 Sep 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> > 
> > > oh.. and i'm not forgetting plphp, but it has both licensing issues and
> > > isn't ready for prime time.
> > 
> > I thought there weren't any license issues, except mayhaps with the name.
> > 
> > http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
> 
> That is what I thought too.  Originally PlPHP was stated as being
> released as GPL (which the author thought was used by PHP), but later
> corrected to be the BSD license.
> 

The naming issue was the one that had stuck in my head. 

(Noting that it isn't BSD licensed, it's PHP licensed, which might be a
problem for some, but seems fairly BSD compatible).  

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: PL contribution guidelines?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Threads vs Processes