I'd tend to agree, focus on that one first. The main site could probably
use some touching up, but with andreas changes and the theoretical
changes for varied width that could happen "any day now", yet another
change into the mix probably won't get done.. :-\
techdocs is really a bastard child these days, so i'd stay away from it
if possible...
Robert Treat
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 23:37, Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi Wade,
>
> My thought here is that the Advocacy site needs re-doing, as the version
> that is there was built to be an initial point of reference and not much
> has been done with it since. (Maintenance of that site is difficult
> because of the way it's structured).
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
>
> Wade Klaver wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> > I may be able to wrangle a pro designer into donating some work for us. I
> > can't guarantee anything at this juncture, but he is willing to help if/when
> > he has the time. My question is two-fold: What sites do people feel are in
> > need of the most serious face-lift and how do people feel about a more or
> > less common theme between all the sites? Currently www, advocacy and
> > techdocs are all quite different. Also, does anyone have the hi-res original
> > images for things like the elephant in the diamond, any other PG artwork,
> > etc?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
