Re: pg_id and pg_encoding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: pg_id and pg_encoding
Date
Msg-id 1062971771.1017.596.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_id and pg_encoding  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 16:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > 
> > Is there any reason to keep separate pg_id and pg_encoding programs, or 
> > should they be merged into a C version of initdb? AFAICS initdb is the 
> > only thing that uses them.
> 
> Yes, I assume they would go away with a C version.

I use both of them for the Debian packaging, to try to ensure that
upgrading goes seamlessly.

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight, UK                             http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================   "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord      shall be saved."
    Romans 10:13 
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Unixware 713 probs
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Index creation takes for ever