Re: Powergres (was Re: Errors on restoring a 7.1.2 dump - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Powergres (was Re: Errors on restoring a 7.1.2 dump
Date
Msg-id 1062666776.17023.2.camel@haggis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Powergres (was Re: Errors on restoring a 7.1.2 dump to 7.3.3)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-novice
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 01:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
> > What makes Powergres special?  From looking at the pretty pictures
> > (and ignoring the squiggly lines), it looks like replication.
>
> Not sure if there's any replication in it.  My understanding is that
> it amounts to ripping out the lowest layers of the Postgres code and
> bolting in Fujitsu's proprietary storage engine (originally developed
> for some other DBMS) instead.  The Fujitsu people say that this gives
> some significant performance improvements, and for all I know it might
> do replication too.  But I've not yet seen a straight answer about
> whether their code preserves MVCC semantics, rollback-able DDL changes,
> and other nice stuff that the regular PG code provides.  This report
> from Stuart isn't exactly giving me warm fuzzies about the robustness
> of Fujitsu's code, either.

Here's what someone sent me off-list:
http://osb.sra.co.jp/PowerGres/function-en.php

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA

"Man, I'm pretty. Hoo Hah!"
Johnny Bravo


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: "Marcin Gil"
Date:
Subject: postfix+pgsql = unexpected EOF
Next
From: "Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes"
Date:
Subject: Postgres dump & restore madness