Re: listening addresses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: listening addresses
Date
Msg-id 10625.1079800141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: listening addresses  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: listening addresses  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> A small problem with it was reported to me a couple of days ago - user 
> had firewalled off all IP6 traffic. The stats collector happily bound 
> and connected to the socket, but all the packets fell in the bit bucket. 
> They found it quite hard to diagnose the problem.

> Possible solutions that occurred to me:
> . an initial "hello"-"yes i'm here" exchange to validate the address

That one seems reasonable to me.  Seems like it would take just a few
more lines of code in the loop that tries to find a working socket to
check that we can send a byte and receive it.  You'd have to be careful
not to block if the socket is indeed not working ... also, is it safe to
assume that a byte sent with send() is *immediately* ready to recv()?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: listening addresses
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: listening addresses