Re: Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Nils Philippsen
Subject Re: Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run
Date
Msg-id 1060599991.3147.10.camel@gibraltar.stuttgart.redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 10:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Nils Philippsen writes:
>=20
> > Is this expected behaviour
>=20
> Yes.

Hmm. I ask myself whether this is desired behaviour, too.

Given that this isn't obviously documented (at least I didn't find it),
I'd expect sort order to be dependent on server_encoding or
client_encoding, but not on a locale setting that was present at
initialisation of the database structures (and which isn't changeable
except by dump&reload).

Nils
--=20
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp@redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run