Re: Some vacuum & tuning help - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: Some vacuum & tuning help
Date
Msg-id 1060174448.19347.0.camel@zeutrh9
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some vacuum & tuning help  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> For core code, the answer would be a big NYET.  We do not do feature
> additions in point releases, only bug fixes.  While contrib code is more
> under the author's control than the core committee's control, I'd still
> say that you'd be making a big mistake to not follow that basic
> guideline.  People expect release x.y.z+1 to be the same as x.y.z except
> for bug fixes.  Introducing any new bugs into x.y.z+1 would cause a
> large loss in your credibility.
>
> (speaking as one who's introduced new bugs into a point-release
> recently, and is still embarrassed about it, even though the intent
> was only to fix older bugs...)

Right, OK, that is basically the answer I was expecting, but thought I
would ask.

Matthew


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL performance problem -> tuning
Next
From: "Wilson A. Galafassi Jr."
Date:
Subject: Postgresql slow on XEON 2.4ghz/1gb ram