Re: [GENERAL] select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent data
Date
Msg-id 106.1077680104@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] select statement against pg_stats returns  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> anyarray has been defined this way since 7.3 -- any concerns there?

I don't think so --- we weren't trying to use it as an actual column
datatype back then.

7.4 has a problem though :-( ... this is one of the "damn I wish we'd
caught that before release" ones, since it can't easily be fixed without
initdb.  Reminds me that I need to get to work on making pg_upgrade
viable again.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is indexing broken for bigint columns?
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] select statement against pg_stats returns