Re: EXTERNAL storage and substring on long strings - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Cain
Subject Re: EXTERNAL storage and substring on long strings
Date
Msg-id 1059685870.1429.73.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EXTERNAL storage and substring on long strings  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Joe,

I'm working on the comparison--I think the best way to do it is to
reload the original data into a new database and compare them, so it
will take a while.

I have tuned postgresql.conf according to the page that everybody around
here seems to cite. I'll probably post back tomorrow with another set of
results.

Also, the perl script that did several queries used lengths of 5000,
10,000 and 40,000 because those are the typical lengths I would use
(occasionally shorter).

Thanks,
Scott

On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 16:49, Joe Conway wrote:
> Scott Cain wrote:
> > So it is possible that if I had a fast scsi drive, the performance might
> > be better?
>
> Faster drives are always better ;-)
>
> Did you try the comparison with shorter substrings? Also, maybe not
> related to your specific question, but have you tuned any other
> postgresql.conf settings?
>
> Joe
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Cain, Ph. D.                                         cain@cshl.org
GMOD Coordinator (http://www.gmod.org/)                     216-392-3087
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd performance results
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL storage and substring on long strings