On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 13:25, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2003 17:08 EEST you wrote:
>
> > On 24 Jul 2003 at 15:54, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
[snip]
>
> we do not have memory problem or disk problems. as I have seen in the list the best way to
> use disks are using raid 10 for data and raid 1 for os. we can put as much memory as
> we require.
>
> now the question, if we have 100 searches per second and in each search if we need 30 sql
> instruction, what will be the performance of the system in the order of time. Let us say
> we have two machines described aove in a cluster.
That's 3000 sql statements per second, 180 thousand per minute!!!!
What the heck is this database doing!!!!!
A quad-CPU Opteron sure is looking useful right about now... Or
an quad-CPU AlphaServer ES45 running Linux, if 4x Opterons aren't
available.
How complicated are each of these SELECT statements?
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA |
| |
| "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian |
| because I hate vegetables!" |
| unknown |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
