Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> writes:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 17:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm, don't you *want* a failure if the patch is already applied?
> It's pretty common that in a larger patchset the first 1-2
> small/trivial patches get committed before the rest. Having to then
> send an additional email, resubmitting the rest of the patchset
> because CFBot fails when re-applying those is kind of silly. This
> avoids that.
Got it. That is indeed an improvement, though of course it only
helps if those patches were applied verbatim.
regards, tom lane
