I know I'm new to this list, but is OSDL's testing capabilities out of
the question?
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 13:48, Thomas Swan wrote:
> Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Thomas Swan wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Is it possible the sourceforge compile farms could be used for some of
> >>the automated testing? I'm not sure how that system works, but it could
> >>be worth looking into.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Isn't the sourceforge license very scary and along the lines of "whatever you
> >put on here we own it's just we tend not to persue that at the moment as
> >there's not much money in it for us but that doesn't stop us from claiming it
> >at some indeterminate time in the future"?
> >
> If it's that intrusive, then it was a bad idea. But, I didn't find
> anything like that on their Terms of Use
> <http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6048&group_id=1>
> page. The compiler farm has a relatively small number of platforms, but
> perhaps it would be enough to get started with at least verifying an
> automated test would work. See Guide to the Sourceforge Compile Farm
> <http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=762&group_id=1>.
...
--
Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>
Coremetrics, Inc.
