Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date
Msg-id 1056405812.64205.19.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
List pgsql-hackers
> Perhaps the people on this list who are pushing 2PC could do the ground work?


- 2PC is better than a standard transaction when dealing with multiple
servers as it can recover in some circumstances (but not all).

- 2PC (XA support as described by the X/Open group) is the only
implementation of distributed transactions supported by many third party
components -- that I'm aware of -- to the point where it is a part of
the Java Spec on dealing with distributed transactions.

- 2PC isn't very good in a number of circumstances, as such PostgreSQL
should avoid its use when PostgreSQL has a choice in the matter -- like
communication with other PostgreSQL servers.

This is a case of learning to speak Japanese because all of the people
you want to talk with only speak Japanese. It simply doesn't matter how
good Esperanto is.

--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PlPython