Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication
Date
Msg-id 105576.1631384927@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 7:57 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
> <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly,
>> so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have
>> passed regression test.

> Pushed!

Shouldn't the CF entry for this be closed? [1]

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/34/3311/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: new regexp_*(text, text, int) functions crash