Re: PostgreSQL configuration - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL configuration
Date
Msg-id 10529.1081783983@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL configuration  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL configuration
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> My personal opinion is that we should move the config files from
> pgsql/data to pgsql/data/etc.  Unix config files aren't put in /, they
> are in /etc, so this seems logical.  I was never comfortable with having
> editable files right next to files that shouldn't be touched.

Perhaps we are arguing at cross-purposes.  Are you saying that the
postmaster should seek config files as, eg, $PGDATA/etc/postgresql.conf
instead of $PGDATA/postgresql.conf?  That would be all right with me.
I thought you were proposing to move them to /etc (absolute path),
which isn't all right ...

> Secondly, everyone seems to like the 'include' idea, and it gives
> per-line control over file sharing.

Yeah, I think include is non-controversial, the argument is about what
else (if anything) to change.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL configuration
Next
From: pgsql@mohawksoft.com
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL configuration