On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 08:51, justin@postgresql.org wrote:
> Quoting Scott Lamb <slamb@slamb.org>:
>
> > Okay, I'm looking back at this thread from a week ago about using CVS
> > for the websites. I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here, but the
> > more I look at it, the more I think that the arguments that convinced
> > me were not good.
> >
> > On Tuesday, Apr 15, 2003, at 12:46 US/Central, ""
> > <justin@postgresql.org> wrote:
> > > One of the significant contributing reasons to the jobs.postgresql.org
> >
> > > site not
> > > getting off the ground was because everyone who wanted to work on it
> >
> > > had to
> > > commit to CVS in order to do anything.
> >
> > Where was this discussed? I looked for like a pgsql-jobs and
> > pgsql-jobs-cvs mailing list and found nothing.
>
> There was a private mailing list that the people who volunteered subscribed to.
>
I'd just like to put forth the opinion that the private list/discussion
is the reason why it never got off the ground.
that said, I have on it on my todo list to add some basic links to job
search sites to the page rather than leaving it as "under development".
if anyone is interested in working on a more full fledged
jobs.postgresql.org site, please put forward a proposal.
Robert Treat
