Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Date
Msg-id 10512.1568751170@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-www
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-06-01 19:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'll probably bite the bullet and upgrade that box sometime in the
>> next year or so, but it's not really a near-term project.  Is there
>> any big hurry for having ccache for coverage builds?

> I happened to come across this again.  I think we should make the change
> Álvaro was proposing.  The fix in ccache is 5 years old now.

Fair enough, I can just install a newer ccache version locally.

But should we worry about any buildfarm members running old ccache
versions?  It'd probably be polite to notify the owners list about
what the minimum ccache version is going to be.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org