Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
Date
Msg-id 1050A00D-0076-4E8B-9179-1AEB69863F84@yesql.se
Whole thread
In response to PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread  (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
List pgsql-hackers
> On 18 Jun 2026, at 22:01, Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> For me, the most important reason is OpenSSL, because upstream has
> already reached 4.0 and we still can't drop code written for 1.1.1.

The entire OpenSSL 3.x line will be down to just 3.5 LTS by the time we ship
v20.

One complicating factor when it comes to OpenSSL is that we need the 1.1.1 API
support in order to keep LibreSSL supported.  I have a patch almost done for
separating the two such that we can move them independently of each other, but
summer vacation and other $life stuff delayed it.  I'll try to get it posted
shortly so that we can start the discussion around that.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal - queryid can be used as filter for auto_explain
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread